For Women Scotland v The Scottish Ministers: the implications of the Supreme Court ruling on gender under the Equality Act 2010
JMW Solicitors • May 29, 2025


The Supreme Court handed down its ruling in the case of For Women Scotland v The Scottish Ministers on 16 April 2025. They have ruled that when it comes to the provisions of the Equality Act 2010 (“EA 2010”), “sex” means “biological sex”. This does not include transgender people, even if they have a Gender Recognition Certificate (“GRC”).


There has been widespread public debate surrounding the decision since it was handed down. In this article, we will attempt to clarify the implications of the decision.


Background to the case


The legal issue emerged following a Scottish government initiative in 2018 which aimed to improve female representation on public boards. At the time the initiative was launched, transgender women with a GRC were considered, for the purpose of the Gender Representation on Public Boards (Scotland) Act 2018 (“ASP 2018”), to fall within the definition of a “woman”. According to the accompanying statutory guidance, this therefore brought transgender women with a GRC within the definition of a ‘woman’ under the EA 2010.


In 2020, For Women Scotland Ltd, an organisation that campaigns to strengthen women’s rights in Scotland, challenged the government guidance. This resulted in new statutory guidance being issued, highlighting that section 212 of the EA 2010 defines a “woman” as “a female of any age”, and stating that a trans-feminine person with a GRC is a woman for the purpose of gender representation on public boards.


For Women Scotland Ltd challenged the new statutory guidance in 2022, advancing the argument that the definition of a “woman” under the EA 2010 refers to biological sex, and therefore a trans woman with a GRC should not be included. This was the issue to be determined by the Supreme Court.


The Supreme Court decision


The Supreme Court unanimously allowed the appeal by For Women Scotland Ltd and held that within the EA 2010, the terms “man”, “woman” and “sex” refer to biological sex.


The Supreme Court concluded this interpretation was necessary for clarity and coherency for provisions on maternity and pregnancy as well as other sex-based protections. The Court emphasised the importance of the Act being consistent and confirmed it would not be appropriate to include different definitions of “sex” for different parts of the Act.


The Supreme Court stated that this decision does not reduce the separate protection against discrimination which is afforded to transgender people under the protected characteristic of gender reassignment. 


EHRC guidance


The Equality and Human Rights Commission has issued interim guidance on the main consequences of the judgment, which can be found here.


This guidance reiterates that it is compulsory for employers to provide sufficient single-sex toilets in the workplace and, where required, single-sex washing and changing facilities. Furthermore, trans women should not be permitted to use the women’s facilities and trans men should not be permitted to use men’s facilities.


The guidance identifies that in some circumstances, the law allows trans women (biological men) not to be permitted to use the men’s facilities, and trans men (biological woman) not to be permitted to use the women’s facilities.


Where there are facilities available to both men and women, however, trans people should not be put in a position where there are no facilities for them to use.


The EHRC has confirmed that it intends to provide an updated Code of Practice to the UK Government which will help employers and other bodies to understand their duties under the Equality Act and put these into practice.


Implications for the workplace


The recent judgment will require employers to review their policies when it comes to toilets, changing rooms and washing areas.


Following the Supreme Court decision, the starting point is that transgender people should use the bathroom correlating to their biological sex. However, there are legal risks in this approach, as transgender people are protected against discrimination by the characteristic of gender reassignment. A person with gender dysphoria may also have the protected characteristic of a disability. If a workplace bathroom policy is seen to be discriminatory on the basis of gender reassignment or gender dysphoria, then the company could be at risk of tribunal proceedings on this basis. Employers should identify which facilities a transgender person may use while also retaining some single-sex facilities.


As an alternative, the 1992 regulations provide that employers may provide facilities in a room with a lock capable of being secured from the inside, to be used by one person at a time. These can be used by anyone. Employers may consider choosing to update their facilities to unisex options which are compliant with these standards.


Fundamentally, this is an issue of competing rights. Companies will need to assess which rights are engaged in each individual case and consider how any policy could impact potential discrimination claims on the basis of:

  •     Sex,
  •     Gender reassignment,
  •     Religion and belief, and
  •      Disability.



Article by JMW Solicitors LLP

By Simon Bliss August 25, 2026
The latest UK employment data makes uncomfortable reading for the recruitment sector, but it also reinforces why independent recruitment businesses need to work differently in today's market. According to the latest Adzuna UK Job Market Report, reported by Staffing Industry Analysts, the number of UK vacancies stood at 791,490 in July 2026, down 9.6% year-on-year. This represents a reversal of some of the gradual improvement seen earlier in the year and confirms what many recruiters are already experiencing: there are fewer vacancies to compete for and clients remain cautious about hiring. However, the headline figure doesn't tell the whole story, there are still areas of growth Several important sectors continue to expand: Teaching vacancies increased 11.9% year-on-year Trade & Construction increased 8.3% Manufacturing increased 2.2% Travel vacancies increased 348% Meanwhile, average advertised salaries remain 3.01% higher than a year ago at £43,675. IT continues to command the highest average salaries at £67,771, up 16.8% annually, while salary growth was also strong in Sales (+11.3%), HR & Recruitment (+9.8%) and Consultancy (+9.5%). So while overall hiring demand has reduced, there are still sectors, skills and individual employers where significant recruitment opportunities exist. A smaller market makes every opportunity more valuable for independent recruitment businesses, perhaps the most important lesson isn't simply that there are fewer jobs. It's that every job, candidate and client relationship has become more valuable. When vacancies were plentiful, recruiters could afford to walk away from a role outside their specialism, geography or candidate network. In today's market, that is potentially lost revenue. Similarly, recruiters may already have excellent candidates sitting within their databases for whom they don't currently have a suitable vacancy, that creates a strong argument for collaboration. The TEAM Advantage: TEAM was built around the principle that independent recruitment businesses can achieve more by working together while retaining their independence. Through TEAM Xchange, members can share vacancies and candidates with other trusted recruitment businesses. If one member has the vacancy and another has the right candidate, they can make the placement together and share the fee. Last year, TEAM members shared £10.4 million in recruitment fees through TEAM Xchange. In a market where vacancies are down 9.6%, the ability to access opportunities beyond your own individual client base becomes increasingly important. Instead of saying: "We can't fill that." or: "We don't recruit in that sector." a TEAM member has the opportunity to ask: "Could another TEAM member help us make this placement?" Likewise, a strong candidate who cannot currently be placed with your own clients may be exactly what another TEAM member needs. Smaller recruiters can remain agile, t here is another reason for optimism. Challenging markets often reward businesses that can move quickly. Independent recruiters typically have fewer layers of management, closer client relationships and the ability to specialise deeply in particular markets. Combine that agility with access to a wider recruitment community and suddenly a small recruitment business can have considerably greater reach than its headcount might suggest. TEAM members can draw upon fellow specialists across multiple sectors, regions and disciplines rather than trying to build every capability internally. That means remaining independent without having to operate alone. Focus on what you can control and n obody can control the overall number of UK vacancies. Recruitment business owners can, however, control how effectively they exploit the opportunities that remain. That means: Specialising – Know where your expertise genuinely adds value. Collaborating – Don't automatically turn away vacancies or candidates you can't service yourself. Working your candidate database – Great candidates already known to you are valuable assets. Expanding client conversations – Understand where clients are still hiring and where skills remain difficult to find. Using your network – Access knowledge, candidates, jobs and expertise beyond your own business. Protecting margins – In a more competitive market, quality and specialist expertise matter more than competing purely on price. Tough market. Different opportunity. The July figures show that UK recruitment remains challenging. Graduate recruitment is particularly difficult, with vacancies falling 45.6% year-on-year to a record low of 8,383, while several major sectors continue to experience significant reductions in hiring. But there are still almost 800,000 advertised vacancies across the UK, salaries continue to rise annually and several sectors are growing. For independent recruiters, the objective isn't to wait for the market to return to the conditions of a few years ago, it's to adapt to the market we have today. At TEAM, we believe collaboration is one of the ways independent recruiters can do exactly that: sharing opportunities, accessing specialist expertise and helping each other make placements that might otherwise have been lost. In a market with fewer jobs, making more of every opportunity matters more than ever.
By Andy Dunne August 21, 2026
TEAM Membership over 2 months: Four permanent invoices, one temp placement and nearly £10,000 in split fees.
By Andy Dunne August 14, 2026
I’ve finally broken the 2 million LinkedIn impressions marker in 365 days.
By Andy Dunne August 5, 2026
Why TEAM chose WTT, and why I believe it's one of the biggest enhancements to Membership we've ever made
TEAMBlog webinar banner with blue geometric background and title, โ€œWhy the Best Independent Recruiters Donโ€™t Go It Alone.โ€
By Simon Bliss July 30, 2026
Collaboration isn't giving something away, it's creating opportunities you could never win on your own.
By Partners& June 9, 2026
At a time when recruitment businesses are faced with myriad challenges, the fact that Partners& has joined the TEAM Network is welcome news. Partners& is an award winning insurance advisory business committed to collaborating with clients to help them protect their business and build lasting resilience.
By Simon Bliss June 9, 2026
In Clifton Diocese (“the Diocese”) v Parker [2026], the Employment Appeal Tribunal (“EAT”) considered whether the burden of proof test was being misapplied in respect of a religion or belief discrimination case and confirmed the legal approach to be taken. This case also highlighted deficiencies with the employer’s process, escalation of initial performance concerns and the sanction applied. Read on for further details of why this case is important, especially for employers dealing with performance issues and conducting formal processes.
By Simon Bliss April 30, 2026
On 7 April 2026, the Fair Work Agency (“FWA”) was established as an executive agency of the Department for Business and Trade. Its creation marks a significant shift in how worker protections are enforced, by bringing together multiple enforcement functions which were previously exercised by multiple bodies.
By Simon Bliss April 9, 2026
In Dobson v North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust (the “Trust”), the Employment Tribunal considered whether the Trust’s policy of requiring all community nurses to be available to work flexibly, including at weekends, amounted to indirect sex discrimination.
New Acas Survey on the Employment Rights Act 2025
March 3, 2026
New Acas Survey on the Employment Rights Act 2025